Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tax receipt/verification page #2378

Open
wants to merge 31 commits into
base: feature/tax-receipt
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sunilsabatp
Copy link
Contributor

@sunilsabatp sunilsabatp commented Jan 22, 2025

Title: Implement Tax Receipt Verification and Download Feature

Description:
Added a new verification interface for tax receipt downloads that:

  • Displays donation history with reference numbers, amounts, and payment dates
  • Shows recipient information including name, company, TIN, and address
  • Adds UI components for confirming/downloading receipt

To DO:

  • Donor data modification page

How to test:
Note : Use the development API's to test the feature
Figma design -> https://www.figma.com/design/lT7AVzzAUM0NyThCyvacob/MyForest-Dashboard?node-id=4824-1294&t=kXNroXn6Xt7SbaaB-0
Route ->/verify-receipt-data?dtn={dtn}&challenge={challenge}&year={year}

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 22, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
planet-webapp-multi-tenancy-setup ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Feb 5, 2025 10:43am
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
planet-webapp ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 5, 2025 10:43am
planet-webapp-temp ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Feb 5, 2025 10:43am

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 22, 2025

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

…ameters (dtn, year, challenge)

- Implemented logic to fetch donation receipt data when valid query parameters are present.
- Added type checks for dtn, year, and challenge before making the API request.
- Updated the donation receipt data upon successful fetch.
- Handled errors in case of failed API request.
- added next-intl keys for "donationAmount" and "name" with currency and type-based rendering.
- defined proper types for Donor, Donation, and ReceiptData for stricter TypeScript typing.
- moved fetchReceiptData logic from ReceiptDataSection to DonationReceiptLayout for better separation of concerns.
- simplified UI by removing firstName and lastName fields, displaying only Name.
- added skeleton structure for the receipt verification page to enhance loading experience.
…ents

- added `formatReceiptData` helper to transform `ReceiptDataAPI` into `ReceiptData` with strict type validation.
- Updated `ReceiptData`  to include `operation` and `issuedDonations` fields.
- Improved type safety for `DonorView`, `AddressView`, and donation-related properties.
- Refactored components to align with the updated ReceiptData structure and context logic.
- Rename hasUserDataChanged to hasDonorDataChanged
…ataSection

- Relocated the `confirmDonorData` logic to improve component structure and ensure relevant logic resides within `ReceiptDataSection`.
-Introduce spinner for loading state.
Copy link
Collaborator

@mohitb35 mohitb35 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sunilsabatp Please go through my feedback

  • Increase the margin above the skeleton to make it in line with the top of the UI when the page renders (i.e. the top of the h2 element)
  • When url params are missed out, the user gets stuck on the loading screen, we could show an error message and redirect in a similar way to handling an error while fetching receipt data

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be DonationReceiptContext instead of DonorReceiptContext?

The same applies for other places such names are used in this file.

Comment on lines 48 to 57
const data = await putRequest({
tenant: tenantConfig.id,
url: `/app/donationReceipt/verify`,
data: {
dtn,
challenge,
year,
verificationDate: getVerificationDate(),
},
});
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add a type (T) for putRequest.

Comment on lines 28 to 34
if (!(dtn || year || challenge || router.isReady)) return;
if (
typeof dtn !== 'string' ||
typeof year !== 'string' ||
typeof challenge !== 'string'
)
return;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should have explicit error handling in these cases. Currently I just see a loader which never disappears.

List down the possible scenarios for the url, and explicitly handle them. It isn't a good idea to make the user wait endlessly.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Capitalize the file name for consistency i.e. DonationReceipt.module.scss.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please don't use this translation file, create a new one just for the donation receipt flow.

We'd want to remove this eventually as it is part of legacy code when the donate platform was within the webapp.

Comment on lines 3 to 27
@mixin flex-layout(
$display: flex,
$flex-direction: null,
$justify-content: null,
$align-items: null,
$gap: null
) {
display: $display;

@if $justify-content {
justify-content: $justify-content;
}

@if $align-items {
align-items: $align-items;
}

@if $gap {
gap: $gap;
}

@if $flex-direction {
flex-direction: $flex-direction;
}
}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I understand the intention here, but this makes the code less readable. I need to remember the parameter order while reading the code, or keep referring back here.

I suggest removing this and using the required css directly with standard flexbox properties- even if it is longer, it is actually easier to read.

const t = useTranslations('Donate');
const tCountry = useTranslations('Country');
const { country, zipCode, city, address1, address2 } = address;
const { type, name, tin } = donor;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggest not destructuring donor for readability.

</span>
<span>{name}</span>
</div>
{tin && (
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Avoid using this pattern. It is easy to have leaked renders.

If using && to conditionally render, make sure the left side is a boolean value.

Comment on lines 33 to 61
<div className={styles.details}>
<div className={styles.donorName}>
<span className={styles.header}>
{t('donationReceipt.name', {
type,
})}
</span>
<span>{name}</span>
</div>
{tin && (
<div className={styles.tin}>
<span className={styles.header}>
{t('donationReceipt.taxIdentificationNumber')}
</span>
<span>{tin}</span>
</div>
)}
</div>
<div className={styles.address}>
<span className={styles.header}>Address</span>
<address>
{address1},{cityStatePostalString}
</address>
{address2 && (
<address>
{address2},{cityStatePostalString}
</address>
)}
</div>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's call the outer divs - donorInfo and addressInfo, just so that the structure is easy to understand.

}

const DonorDetails = ({ donor, address }: Props) => {
if (address === undefined || donor === undefined) return null;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suggest removing this condition, updating the types for donor and address to not allow undefined. We would not want to show just donation details/receipt actions and no donor details.

If donor or address are absent in the data, it should be treated as an error scenario, an appropriate error message should be shown (invalid data encountered), along with a way to get in touch to fix things if needed.

Perhaps this logic could be kept within ReceiptDataSection/DonorReceiptLayout instead, and we could create a component to show an error message instead of the rest of ReceiptDataSection.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants